Season Finale Spoilers!!!

[Jean]

[Jean]

LOL, I'm not surprised at all, the Source awakens at the end of S1. Knowing how fast they move, I bet he is vanquished at the end of S2.

At least the original built that up across four seasons, and Supernatural at least Lucifer came in S5, and they built up the arc of his rising during S3 and S4.

Wonder who is killed off? Please be Galvin.

I hope The Source isn't going to take Parker as his vessel killing him in the process as we heard earlier in the season. The actor isn't strong enough for that.

[BettyNewbie]

I'm thinking this past episode was (hopefully) the last we've seen of Galvin, so I'm going with Parker (and Alastair) as the death in the finale. Alastair is clearly meant to be the season's Big Bad, while Parker's storyline easily sets him up for death (possibly in the form of a heroic sacrifice). The fact that neither the character or actor are very popular, plus the showrunner change for S2, also increases the odds of the show getting rid of him at the end of the season.

[Tim]

Alastair is clearly meant to be the season's Big Bad, while Parker's storyline easily sets him up for death (possibly in the form of a heroic sacrifice).

That's what I'm thinking.  Parker sacrifices himself to stop his father once and for all. 

That way, next season, we can start fresh.

[Katie]

Well, we are for sure getting a death, I'm thrilled and hope it is Parker or Galvin. Do we know if he is really gone from the last episode?

I'll admit not nuts on bringing in the Source this early. But if Classic Charmed took three times to defeat the Source, maybe this reboot can do the same, make it appear he is gone, and have him resurface a second time when the show is ending.

[Tim]

Well, it seemed like Galvin is gone, he couldn't accept Macy for what she was. 

Frankly, I hope he is gone, he added nothing to the show.

[Katie]

Looks like Galvin isn't gone, but he is apparently moving in a month.

I see his story going these ways:
1) He really does leave for good.
2) He reunites with Macy, changes his mind and decides to stay but dies.
3) He becomes the vessel for the Source (plot twist).

I really don't see number 3, but I can really see number 2. Especially if his death has Macy going more darker. I hope it is he dies, because that means he'll be off the show for good. 


I think one of Galvin, Niko or Parker is 100% dead by the end of the season.

I think Niko has story left in her for S2 and can't see her dying, especially when she learns Mel used a spell on her so they never met. It just seems like they are setting up Maggie and or Macy to lose someone. 

I think this puts it towards Galvin and Parker as gone. I think Galvin might be going, as with Parker I sadly think they'll be keeping him around for S2, and if the Source story plays out, but I don't think he'll be the vessel for the Source, that is too predictable, and too Cole 2.0. 

What do you all think?

[BettyNewbie]

Apr 29, 2019 9:11:52 GMT -5 Katie said:

Looks like Galvin isn't gone, but he is apparently moving in a month.

I see his story going these ways:
1) He really does leave for good.
2) He reunites with Macy, changes his mind and decides to stay but dies.
3) He becomes the vessel for the Source (plot twist).

I really don't see number 3, but I can really see number 2. Especially if his death has Macy going more darker. I hope it is he dies, because that means he'll be off the show for good. 


I think one of Galvin, Niko or Parker is 100% dead by the end of the season.

I think Niko has story left in her for S2 and can't see her dying, especially when she learns Mel used a spell on her so they never met. It just seems like they are setting up Maggie and or Macy to lose someone. 

I think this puts it towards Galvin and Parker as gone. I think Galvin might be going, as with Parker I sadly think they'll be keeping him around for S2, and if the Source story plays out, but I don't think he'll be the vessel for the Source, that is too predictable, and too Cole 2.0. 

What do you all think?

Galvin becoming the Source's vessel would be a huge plot twist, for sure, but also a somewhat problematic one (aka. the black male love interest turning evil and dying, while the white male love interest gets to stick around and be redeemed). If Galvin has to die to be written off, I'd rather see him get a heroic death.

Of course, I also want Parker to have a heroic death. Please, show, just drop both of them and start S2 with a clean slate.

[Tim]

Can we please get rid of both Parker and Galvin.   They really add nothing to the show.

[Katie]

Apr 29, 2019 11:17:35 GMT -5 BettyNewbie said:

Apr 29, 2019 9:11:52 GMT -5 Katie said:

Looks like Galvin isn't gone, but he is apparently moving in a month.

I see his story going these ways:
1) He really does leave for good.
2) He reunites with Macy, changes his mind and decides to stay but dies.
3) He becomes the vessel for the Source (plot twist).

I really don't see number 3, but I can really see number 2. Especially if his death has Macy going more darker. I hope it is he dies, because that means he'll be off the show for good. 


I think one of Galvin, Niko or Parker is 100% dead by the end of the season.

I think Niko has story left in her for S2 and can't see her dying, especially when she learns Mel used a spell on her so they never met. It just seems like they are setting up Maggie and or Macy to lose someone. 

I think this puts it towards Galvin and Parker as gone. I think Galvin might be going, as with Parker I sadly think they'll be keeping him around for S2, and if the Source story plays out, but I don't think he'll be the vessel for the Source, that is too predictable, and too Cole 2.0. 

What do you all think?

Galvin becoming the Source's vessel would be a huge plot twist, for sure, but also a somewhat problematic one (aka. the black male love interest turning evil and dying, while the white male love interest gets to stick around and be redeemed). If Galvin has to die to be written off, I'd rather see him get a heroic death.

Of course, I also want Parker to have a heroic death. Please, show, just drop both of them and start S2 with a clean slate.

Yeah that might be a bit of a problem I agree.

I can see them doing that with him getting a heroic death, or killing him off to have Macy tap into her dark side as a plot for S2, but I feel it is WAY too early for any of the sisters to go dark, I mean after one season.

I'll hope they just drop both of them. Really the one supporting character that is an asset is Harry, and talk about being the opposite of Leo, where now I wished he was gone. With Harry, I'll be mad if he were written off.

[BettyNewbie]

Apr 30, 2019 7:32:46 GMT -5 Katie said:

Yeah that might be a bit of a problem I agree.

I can see them doing that with him getting a heroic death, or killing him off to have Macy tap into her dark side as a plot for S2, but I feel it is WAY too early for any of the sisters to go dark, I mean after one season.

I'll hope they just drop both of them. Really the one supporting character that is an asset is Harry, and talk about being the opposite of Leo, where now I wished he was gone. With Harry, I'll be mad if he were written off.

Fully agreed. *nods* I love Harry and his substitute father/big brother dynamics with the sisters (especially given that the sisters are so disconnected from their actual fathers), so the show absolutely needs to keep him around. Even better, now that he's an independent whitelighter and doesn't have to answer to the Elders anymore. This show has definitely learned from the mistakes the old one made with Leo, that's for sure.

[Tim]

Parker should be the one to die, taking Neo-Rex and Hunter with him.   While Neo-Rex and Hunter end up in Tartarus, Parker gets to go to Heaven with his human mother.

Of course, Maggie is grief stricken, but her sisters help her through it.

Galvin leaves to take that job for Doctors Without Borders.

Mel and Niko are slowly reconnecting. 

[Melinda Halliwell]

If anything the one thing I would like with this new Source is that it can't be killed like the first Source then Cole/Source in original Charmed were because of who it is which leaves only a small selection of options like containing it as Lucifer was in Supernatural then or whatever else even if the sisters try to get it out of whomever it possesses and fails subsequently.

That was my pet peeve with original Charmed that both Source's were vanquished so easily making the four years the sisters trained to defeat him anti climactic IMO really.

[Tim]

And this Source is not a whiny half-faced loser that everyone can point and laugh at.

[Katie]

Apr 30, 2019 14:19:00 GMT -5 Melinda Halliwell said:

If anything the one thing I would like with this new Source is that it can't be killed like the first Source then Cole/Source in original Charmed were because of who it is which leaves only a small selection of options like containing it as Lucifer was in Supernatural then or whatever else even if the sisters try to get it out of whomever it possesses and fails subsequently.

That was my pet peeve with original Charmed that both Source's were vanquished so easily making the four years the sisters trained to defeat him anti climactic IMO really.

Mine too. I really don't get how you can even kill the Source of all Evil. I mean couldn't have just banish him to Hell. I still believe that the Source was not originally suppose to reside in the Underworld, they mention in All Hell Breaks Loose, he resurfaced, meaning that he comes from somewhere else, most likely hell. And the exposure of magic got his attention enough to show himself to the underworld.

And I liked the Red Source with the large wings better than the Half-Faced Source. Now he was what I'd call scary and believable as the ruler of the underworld and hell. 

And not sure, but I never got why the Charmed Ones even needed to battle the Source and or the Devil. Wouldn't a powerful warlock and or the Evil Charmed Ones have been enough, and made more sense. 

Personally, I'd have been happier if Zankou was the Source. He was a better big bad. 

It really was pretty easy killing him.